Crushing the Box

Breaking the chains of 9 to 5 and obtaining total freedom – a new approach to entrepreneurism.

Vendor irritation, as well as some good thoughts January 8, 2008

Filed under: High Level Stuff, Positioning, Tactics — justindavis @ 10:53 am
Tags: , , ,

Just got off the phone with one of the vendors who may be able to build our prototype/do production runs.  I’ve got some mixed feelings on using this vendor.  The general tone of the phone call was one of “Uh…we want to make sure you really want to build this product before we spend time doing estimates”.  Well…that sucks.  Hate that you feel lazy enough that you don’t want to do about 20 minutes worth of work to potentially have a lifetime customer.  Bad customer service if you ask me.

Now, he did raise a good question for me.  Again, since I’m not saying much regarding the product itself, I’ll try to elaborate unspecifically…however unsuccessful that may be.   The general question he raised is one of this: “The price of the product will end up being higher than the value it delivers, at least in terms of actual hard dollars.”  Hmm.  Good point.  Our product isn’t a necessity.  The price point of the product will probably end up in the $30-40 range, and will provide anywhere between $2 and $100 of value to the customer each time it’s used.  Most customers will fall underneath the $30-40 value/price range.

So, does this count this product out?  Does this imbalance between value and price mean that the product doesn’t have a place in the market?  Certainly not, and I might be biased, but let me explain a bit further.

Take, for example, one of those liquor bottle spinner things that holds your bottle upside down.  These retail for anywhere between $285 (kegworks.com) and $25 (some random seller on eBay).  The value of the product is simply that you don’t have to lift your own bottle up and pour it.  Honestly, that’s it.  If someone paid you $285 to lift your own liquor bottles to make a drink, would you?  I certainly would.

So, why do these sell?  Obviously they do, I’ve seen them all over the place and for sale at tons of places.  Well, the value of product isn’t in the dollar-to-dollar savings, it’s in the novelty aspect of the product, as well as some perceived benefits.

For one, the product looks pretty cool.  If I had friends over a lot, they’d probably be impressed and ooh and ahh over my liquor dispenser.  Starting to rachet up the value here.  Also, it (somewhat) saves me some space.  Now, granted, it really doesn’t save much, and in fact, might actually take up more.  However, it’s advertised to save you space.  And that’s worth a bunch.

Remember something here: people doubt themselves the most.  If you tell a potential customer, convincingly, that they need a particular product although the actual value may not make sense logically, they’ll think “Hmm…maybe they’re right.  There must be something I’m missing out on that I just don’t get.  I should buy one and see what it is”.  Now, yes, I understand this doesn’t always work.  Few people are running out to buy Ginsu knives because they think “Man, those knives must really be better than my Henckels.”  I know that’s not the case, but enough people HAVE bought them to keep those wonderful late night infomercials running.  Bless their hearts.

So, what’s all this rambling come down to?  Well, it proves the importance of good marketing and positioning.  Not everyone is going to have a need for your product, but someone will, and if you speak to the right people, in the right way, they’ll buy it.

Does this mean you can create anything and put it out?  Well, it definitely worked for the guy who marketed the Pet Rock.  However, no, it’s not an excuse to flood the market with crap products.  Simply put, it means that to a customer, there is more to just dollar-for-dollar value.  That’s the whole reason Mercedes-Benz is in business.  They convince you that the stature is important…and that has little to do with what the car is intended to do – transport you from one place to another.

Ok, that rant is over.

The last point I’ll make is this.  Vendors, and I think this is important, are in the business of manufacturing products.  (By vendors in this case, I mean contract manufacturers).  They are not, and should not be, involved with product feasability and marketing questions, unless it directly relates to a manufacturing process.

For instance, this vendor told me this would be an expensive product to make, and when I asked him what part of the design would be particularly expensive, he couldn’t really tell me, but simply stated he thought it would be more expensive than the value it delivered, on a dollar-to-dollar basis.  Not his place to say, if you ask me.  Do I appreciate feedback?  Sure, but not baseless feedback.  If he had told me that the way I designed the product would make it expensive to manufacture for reasons x,y, and z, then I would have appreciated it.  He’s in the business of manufacturing, not me.  This is why I would hire him.

To wrap up this insane rant, I’ll just underscore that people should evaluate products and services within the purveyance of their own expertise.  I wouldn’t tell a hot air balloon manufacturer that the materials they use for their baskets don’t make sense.  I have zero experience in marketing and manufacturing hot air balloons.  Seems so simple, doesn’t it?

Unfortunately, this vendor already has an uphill battle getting me to do business with them.  Just give me the damn quote and stop bitching.

 

Redesign and a name January 3, 2008

Filed under: Positioning, Tactics — justindavis @ 2:47 pm

Last night was productive.  Two things we (by the way, the “we” is myself and my wife Mollie, who is also working hard on this project) got done that I feel really helped us:

  • Redesign of the product
  • Name for it

As I’ve mentioned, this product was designed for the craft beer drinker, and eventually would also be tailored to the wine drinker.  I realized yesterday that it’s probably better to go ahead and make this version of the product accessible to both, to increase our total potential market.  As much as I want craft beer drinkers to buy and use this, I have a suspicion that we’ll have a much higher response initially from the wine crowd.  In an effort to give ourselves the best starting position, we sat down last night and went thru a redesign that made it work for both.

The redesign process was good for several reasons.  First, it allowed us to include wine people as a potential target market – a huge audience.  Second, it took the product from what was earlier quite a clunky, inefficient mess to a nice sleek design that I think is far more appealing.  Third, we started sketching drawings (I knew those years in architecture school would come back to benefit me) and really got into discussing the nitty gritty details of how this thing is going to work.  That was a very helpful process, as it proved to inform the design per the function (form follows function).  So, overall, the redesign was a pretty awesome experience and the hour’s worth of work it entailed produced a much nicer and more effective product.

Secondly, we came up with a name.  I’ll let everyone in on the name as we get a bit closer to production,  but again, to protect the idea I’m not revealing too much right now.  Suffice to say, I think it’ll lend itself nicely to a logo and advertising/marketing materials.  I’m still all about coming up with other options, but we’ve certainly got something to run with for now.  A working title, if you will.

The only problem with the name is that an initial search for domains brought up a ton of domains that are already taken (damn cyber squatters…it really pisses me off).  Time will tell if that’s a deal killer for this particular name, as having a domain that is easily attachable to the name is pretty important, in my mind, for marketing and positioning.  A couple of the domains that we wanted expire within the next month (Jan 12 and Feb 8), so hopefully I’ll be able to jump on them and scoop them up.  Unfortunately, domain names are one of those pretty important things these days.  Not to mention, our plan is to focus solely on web sales initially, so it’s paramount for our purpose.

Today, I’m working on building a crude 3D model and producing some CAD drawings of what I sketched out last night.  This will help to get further into the nitty gritty, and should expedite the prototyping process quite a bit.

As for the prototyping, I’ve received a few replies, but not many.  One wanted $2500 for a prototype….ha!  We’re talking about a product that’s going to retail for around $30, so that’s WAY too much.  Another quoted an average price of $125, which is totally doable.  On that one, there’s no production commitment, so that’s also very nice.  I’m going to give it a few more days until I start talking to folks about actually getting something built.

That’s it for now…I’ll probably have another update later once I check my email (only checking email at 11 AM and 4 PM daily).